Unaccountability Breeds a Profitable
Corruption Scheme in Family Courts
© Shane Flait (2011)
An unaccountable and
self-managed legal community will
necessarily evolve for its own benefit,
behaviors, rules, and judgments that
abridge our constitutional principles.
Lord Acton’s phrase, “power corrupts;
absolute power corrupts absolutely” is
ever in operation, and no place more
effectively than through the legal scam
that is destroying fathers, families,
and freedom in our Family Courts. Here’s
why…
As much as hundreds
of thousands of dollars is robbed from
an average fit father as a result of
divorce and paternity suits in family
courts based on denying fit fathers
their parental rights to their children
and all that it implies such as
authority, nurture, and direct support
of them. This denial in turn rests on
the legal misuse of ‘best interest of
child standard’ that originally allowed
courts to decide custody issues when
both parents were either unfit or dead.
Now, for political and monetary gain,
this operationally vague standard is
used to rip a fit father from his
children.
It’s important to
recognize that the divorce system
targets the fit father rather than the
fit mother for denial of parental rights
because if fit mothers and fathers were
denied their parental rights more or
less equally, society would reject this
court tyranny immediately. Denying
overwhelmingly only fit fathers their
right to parent (i.e. physical custody)
allows our system of feminist
jurisprudence to count on an avid
support from most women to justify this
constitutional denial along with the
further fundamental rights denials of a
fit father that immediately ensue to
serve the court’s determination of his
child’s ‘best interests’.
Father-vilifying
propaganda, a general cover-up of the
true state of affairs that fathers face,
and the profit and control that mothers
and the rest of the divorce and domestic
violence industry (DDVI) can count on
from a father’s income, assets, and his
‘being’ makes this scam enormously
successful.
Once you
unconstitutionally deny one fundamental
right of a fit father – i.e. the right
to parent his children- it isn’t
difficult for a family court judge to go
on to deny other of his fundamental
rights to serve the judge’s
determinations for what shall be the
‘best interests of the father’s child’
and , of course, the child’s mother
interests too. By these other rights, I
mean his right to determine the use of
his property and income, aside from
taxes as is the case for every citizen,
to choose any lawful profession in which
to employ himself, to his freedom to go
where he wishes – even leave the country
– and, naturally, to count on
constitutional due process in the
courts.
The state demands
that the father’s job (his
responsibility) is simply to supply the
money that the state demands of him for
benefits that the state deems right. It
is a clear case of extortion that the
judges impose; they put a father in a
slave position. It is upon fathers’
backs that this system of tyranny
against fathers survives and grows with
the concomitant destruction of his
family, his children, and his freedom.
(It’s time for ‘Atlas’ to ‘Shrug’ them
off.)
The feminist faction
of this legal tyranny with its profits
and government entwined power is able to
force onto society its unnatural
matriarchal social engineering agenda
while financially and legally crippling
the very fathers who would expose this
tyranny. Indeed, those fathers that do
work to expose this system are singled
out to the family court judges for
special consideration. As a result,
lawyers often warn fathers to stay away
from fathers rights groups during
divorce proceedings.
This tyranny and the
profits that it breeds, illegally
abridge the separation of governmental
branches designed as part of the checks
and balances called for in our
constitution to prevent the type of
over-reaching of government power now in
effect for more profits, power, and
accommodation to the tyranny. But it
must be recognized for what it is before
it can be stopped.
END
