Feminist Jurisprudence Alienates Fathers from their Unalienable Rights
© Shane Flait (2011) 

Fathers can’t believe they’re treated so badly in Family Court – like criminals – when they’ve done nothing wrong. Like each of us, they understand our fundamental rights are supposed to be protected, especially in a court. But what they don’t know is that feminist jurisprudence has infiltrated our court systems leaving their fundamental rights a distant second to the greater good excuses of a state-based judicial tyranny.  

Feminist jurisprudence refers to judicial decisions that subordinate an individual’s fundamental rights and protections to the greater good excuse laws. It’s geared to protecting and benefiting allegedly or potentially abused women from allegedly or potentially abusive men. It incorporates the feminist paradigm that men are intrinsically abusive, women are their victims and, of course, women never lie.

Such claptrap is an anathema to the long established pre-eminence of our unalienable rights including the right to constitutional due process to protect them. There’s no greater good than these individual rights. Tyrannies always deny individual rights – for some or all – and, of course, do so for some ‘greater good’ excuse.

Exploitation of the two feminist-instigated and maintained greater good excuses - safety of abused women and the best interest of the child laws - represents a tyranny and mindset facing fathers in family courts. These excuse laws will alienate from them many of their unalienable rights – beginning with their right to parent their children. It represents the invidious sex discrimination against fathers and their rights that state-imposed feminism creates.

The family court doesn’t follow constitutional due process. It makes orders that daily deny the most fundamental rights of fathers under the unconstitutional greater good excuse laws. It’s grown immensely in its power to tyrannize fathers, destroy families, enforce matriarchal families and reengineer society to a feminist perspective that’s clearly anti-father.

Feminism’s phony hysteria and propaganda of abuse and women’s privileges (disguised as women’s rights) have pushed a majority of America’s breeding adults through this court system to assure that fathers will be subjected to the state and to mothers and deprived of their right to parent equally to that of mothers. Society’s growing fatherlessness, vilification of fathers not complying with this tyranny’s orders, and child pathologies testify to feminist jurisprudence’s effectiveness. 

Fathers face a rigged system

The judicial adherents to feminist jurisprudence whether naïve or unscrupulous will thwart any and all constitutional redress to uphold their tyranny against fathers. They cloak their tyranny using the 'greater good' excuses of best interest of child or abuse of women with the appearance of due process.

Both of these excuses rely on vague criteria for justifying judgments that deny fundamental rights of a litigant – overwhelmingly fathers. Previously, any law that used vague criteria to deny rights was constitutionally voided for vagueness. Law violations that will deny you your fundamental rights must be associated with clear and recognizable wrongs so people can know when their actions will put them in jeopardy.

And, of course, the due process where fundamental rights are at jeopardy requires a high burden of proof of wrongdoing. With clear criteria established for the wrong, proof of the transgression must be beyond a reasonable doubt for a criminal case, and clear and convincing in a civil case – as in most family court issues.   

But unalienable rights are ignored in family court where a woman is pitted against a man. There, feminist jurisprudence rules using its ‘greater good’ excuse laws of vague criteria to deny a father his unalienable right to parent (directly support and care for) his children. Then enslave him to the mother and the state for whatever extortion money the court orders. There’s no room for equal rights and equal outcomes here. That’s not part of the state-imposed feminist agenda. It’s part of the feminist fraud.

Cloaking their unconstitutional denials based on vague criteria family courts give the appearance of due process to the uninformed litigant while soothing the conscience of unscrupulous or cowardly judges and lawyers who feed off this tyranny.

Fathers seeking for themselves and their children the benefit of those unalienable rights and their constitutional protections, promised in the Declaration of Independent and established in Supreme Court case law, become engulfed in the smokescreen of family court processes. Never are his unalienable rights mentioned. Any characterizations, however vague, made against him are accepted on face value, unnecessary or a waste of the court’s time to prove.

It appears that everything is a forgone conclusion. That, somehow, procedures determine only how much will be taken from him including his children. That there was never a rights issue acknowledged, never an assurance of protecting one’s rights. It was all just an appraisal for looting him, for raping him, of his unalienable rights including his children, his property and his future.

 END

 

 

 

Shane Flait writes on issues confronting freedom