Root Causes of How the Family Court Came to Tyrannize Fathers and Families
© Shane Flait (2011)

 

Family court overwhelmingly denies fit and decent fathers, under divorce and paternity suits, their right to parent (i.e. directly care for and support) their children. Doing so turns a father into a virtual slave to both the state and the mother and to pay outrageous extortion payments for the state’s kidnapping of his children - or go to jail. These are all clear violations of his unalienable (fundamental or individual) rights as well as the constitutional protections that were put in place to secure them. But what are the root causes that created such a court tyranny against fathers?

 

Three root causes for the court’s tyranny of fathers are:

1.      The judiciary’s relentless deterioration of their obligation to maintain constitutional protections in court when fundamental rights are at stake.

2.      Feminist’s fraudulent propaganda and it politically correct mindset of intolerance

3.      Feminists push for state-imposed ‘greater good’ laws that benefit women at the expense of the fundamental rights of fathers and men. 

 

1.      Deterioration of the Judiciary – usurping of justice from the people 

Thomas Jefferson was wary of the judiciary and warned us that “[the] judiciary...working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction until all shall be usurped.”

Over time, the judiciary has eliminated protection of defendants and litigants from bad laws and malicious legal processes – nowhere more obvious than in the family court. It’s undermined the rights of litigants by not protecting them against bad law and bad court processes. It’s done this by

• Prohibiting notification in 1898 of rights of the jury to be informed – i.e. that the jurors can judge the law as well as the evidence in the case at hand in court. So if the defendant is tried under a bad law, the jurors can find him innocent despite the evidence. Jurors still have such a right but aren’t notified of it.
• Assuring a jury trial whenever fundamental rights or large amounts of money are at stake – but not in family court where all rights and huge legacies are at stake.
• Allowing only lawyers to ‘practice’ law- since the 1940s rather than the ‘[non lawyer] counsel’ of a litigant’s own choice. Lawyers and their behavior are regulated and protected by State Boards of Bar Overseers. If a lawyer bucks the system then he’ll lose his ticket to practice. But sometimes the ‘system’ must be bucked to prevent its corruption.
• Creating virtual immunity for judges, prosecutors, and a burgeoning number of court affiliates for any action taken by them within their duties. The ability to punish or impeach judges for unconstitutional actions or opinions is next to impossible. This allows corruption.
• Allowing a social engineering mindset into judicial determinations and its members that overrides individual rights for a ‘greater good’ social reason.
   

2.      Feminist’s fraudulent propaganda and its intolerant politically correct mindset

Operational feminism has perverted the 'equal opportunity for women' theme into an ideology of social engineering enforced by a politically correct (PC) mindset that is intolerant to any criticism of feminist ideology. This PC intolerance is enforced in education, business and government and overrides the rights of individual choices. It allows virtually no balance to the ‘perverted-feminism’ that’s brainwashed into children and university students.

Women’s issues are defined as for ‘women only’ and exclude any view by men – or even women - that doesn’t conform to the feminist ‘party-line’. This sort of ideology rests on suppressing free speech and criticism. It slips easily into the idea of social engineering by imposing laws of its own professed ‘greater good’ and that the ‘end justifies the means’.  

3.      Feminists push for state-imposed ‘greater good’ laws that benefit women at the expense of the fundamental rights of fathers and men

The feminist PC propaganda pushed for privileges under government offices of women’s rights. Enormous state power for women’s issues and rights – funded by government – grew. The PC brainwashing against opposition served to prevent appropriate checks on how laws were advantaging women at the direct expense of the rights of men.

 

Tantamount to this was instituting ‘greater good’ excuse laws – though commendable sounding- that violated time-honored court protection rights and due process of male defendants to women’s accusations. The ‘safety of women ‘abuse excuse’ law and its processes typify the benefit of women ‘victims’ at the clear expense of constitutional rights for ‘alleged’ offenders.  

 

Feminist jurisprudence that places the concern of women over the fundamental rights of men and the required due process has embedded itself throughout the court system. No place more affected by this is the feminization of family court. In I  Itr  It forced the perversion of the ‘best interest of the child’ excuse into all cases as a greater good than protecting the rights of fit fathers to parent their own children – and equally so to the mother. It forces the father into a noncustodial category where all other of his fundamental rights could be terminated or restricted without constitutional due process.

 

The creation of a judiciary-based parasite industry feeding off fathers and taxpayers

The clear denial of a fit father’s fundamental rights – including his right to parent his children, and equally so to the mother- and the extortion of money from him for the mother’s benefit has help fund an enormous industry - the divorce and domestic violence industry (DDVI). Taxpayers fund many of this industry’s programs associated with domestic violence.

 

This industry funds most everyone that can possibly benefit from the family court’s denial of a father’s right to parent his children. Outside of the ‘divorced’ and ‘paternity’ mothers it includes judges, lawyers, and court ancillaries to the legal process as well as state and federal revenue agencies.

 

On the domestic abuse side, judges, lawyers, and police departments ultimately benefit from the unjust legal processes. And lastly jails benefit from both since that’s where men and fathers unjustly end up.    

 

A corresponding enormous propaganda program by the DDVI hides the injustice that fathers face.

 

The Feminist Fraud

State-enforced feministic policies have produced the most malicious anti-male sexism imaginable. But PC propaganda manages to suppress awareness of what’s happening and the perversion of laws that tyrannize men for the benefit of women. That’s why operational feminism is a fraud – the feminist fraud.

 

 

 

END