Exposing of Feminist Jurisprudence’s Destruction of Fathers’ Rights
By Shane Flait © 2010

Fathers Rights groups protect the denial of fundamental rights and protections they experience under tyrannical divorce and paternity judgments. This article summarizes some their plight.

 

Four characteristic of our feminist-based tyrannical family courts are:

·        no fault divorce which treats fit fathers as if they were in severe fault,

·        restraining orders handed out like candy against any man - that can send him to jail for up to 2 ½ years for simply mailing a birthday card to his child,

·        child extortion payments based on denying fit fathers their children which in turn affords significant confiscation of their property and income to control, impoverish, and vilify - if not criminalize- them all with the constant threat of jail if they don’t perform ‘a slave’s responsibility’, while denying them fundamental rights for which this country was formed, and lastly

·        propagandizing the vilification of men and fathers to sell the general public on a state’s justification to deny such ‘terrible’ men their rights so that the state can ostensibly promote the ‘best interest of the child’, and ‘safety of women’ while it, in fact, serves only the state’s and it’s agents’ grab for money, power, control, and agenda.

 

 “Best interest of the child’ and ‘safety of women’ are vague and meaningless used to deny fathers their fundamental rights. They’re not legally meaningful terms since the first sets no standard by which a fit father can assure his actions will not justify deprivation of his rights.

 

The second sets up women as a privileged class whose safety can be secured at the clear ‘non safety from illegal deprivation of rights’ that it imposes on men – a clear violation of one of the maxims of law and the 14th Amendment.

  

“Equality in marriage” as written into state laws is just a front to make men think that both father and mother will be treated equally under the law. The state at the whim of the mother will dissolve the marriage and, then, under the state’s perverted use of the ’best interest of the child’ standard, will decide that the child will go to the mother whom the state now husbands at the expense of the father.

 

Operationally, a father no longer owns his children- his most precious possession. The state owns the children and entrusts them with families or with mothers until it decides otherwise.

 

A court-imposed dual status - non-custodial vs custodial - for parents affords all sorts of privileges to the custodial mothers. General propaganda these days now honors single motherhood. This relatively recent ‘honor’ complements the deadbeat dads/abusive men vilification propaganda.

 

Legislators fawn over single mothers as so deserving of the state’s help and the privileges bestowed on them. The true facts simply don’t support this propaganda. 

 

Non-custodial fathers suffer endless punishments and programs if they don’t comply with the tyranny. These programs socialize them into subservience. They’re criminalized for never committing a real crime.

 

First, if a father doesn’t pay all his child extortion payments, he’ll go to jail, have his driver’s license revoked, or denied any state-professional license to work. If he leaves that state or the country without making provision to pay all the child extortion ordered, he commits a felony punishable up to 10 years in jail. And of course he is denied a passport if he is in child-extortion arrears of some few thousand.

 

Endless programs are forced on a father that he must often pay for while being brainwashed into accepting the new imposed social order. They fill the pockets of those in the divorce and domestic violence industry.

 

Anger management classes teach him not to be angry under a tyranny directed specifically at him. Parenting classes teach him that he shouldn’t object to whatever the mother wants. State and court abuse definitions (ultimately defined by whatever a women doesn’t like) put a man who has never battered or threatened physical violence into a “batterers’ program” that trains him to go along with whatever a woman wants and teaches him not to interrupt her when she’s speaking. These are dog-training programs - for men only!

 

Marriage is no longer an operational contract since there is no ‘quid pro quo’ – as any court action will show. A wife/mother has absolutely no obligation to her husband –including fidelity.  Yet she is endowed with nothing but privileges enforced by the state at the expense of the husband/father.

 

The husband/father has all obligations to the mother and no benefits. This is a slave relationship enforced by the state who now becomes the real husband of the wife and extorter of the father. No matter what is written in the perverted marriage laws, this is the operational result. Such a contract would be blatantly illegal in any other context according to maximums of law.