Family Court Tyranny against Fathers versus the Cover-Up Propaganda
© Shane Flait (2011)

 

Fathers face a tyranny against them in family court because the court denies their unalienable rights - also known as fundamental, constitutional, and individual rights – which include their right to parent their children. This article contrasts this fact with the state’s divorce and domestic violence industry’s propaganda that covers up family court’s unconstitutional use of its greater good excuses – safety of women’s abuse excuse and the best interest of the child excuse.  

 

Evidence of a tyranny against fathers

Constitutional protections that the courts and their processes are obliged to follow for all citizens, as litigants and defendants, were put in place to help secure those fundamental rights - the very reason for which the U.S. was formed.  In fact, the lack of such constitutional protections in court is evidence that fundamental rights are being denied.

 

Our founding fathers expected bad laws to occur occasionally. They instituted constitutional court process protections – including fully informed juries – which would help stem the tyranny such laws would produce.

 

Included in bad laws are the ‘greater good excuse’ laws that all tyrannies impose. I call them ‘greater good’ because their execution denies individual rights for some ‘professed’ greater good according to some ideology or temporary necessity. But, of course, no greater good is supposed to exceed our individual rights in a free society – as the U.S. was formed to be. So these individual rights are not ever subject to vote because they’re unalienable.

 

I’ve categorized two laws – safety of women’s ‘abuse law’ and the ‘best interest of the child’ law as ‘greater good excuse’ laws. That’s because their operation in family court clearly negates and denies both the unalienable rights as well as the constitutional protections that each of us is entitled to. The detailed nature of how these greater good laws are carried out in family court shows that they ignore every aspect of constitutional protections and the maxims of law that promote court fairness for litigants.  Therefore these laws represent a tyranny by their nature.

But beyond that, these ‘greater good excuse’ laws and their court processes overwhelmingly deny the rights of fathers while benefitting mothers especially in divorce or paternity actions.

The loss of paternal rights that fit fathers routinely face in family court is unconstitutional and akin to state kidnapping of his children from him. Then, the state’s imposes heavy payments - euphemistically called child support – on fathers that are maliciously enforced and extorted by easy imprisonment of fathers without the required constitutional due process.

Both the new ‘safety of women abuse law’ and the distortion of current family court processes with its ‘best interest of the child’ law over its original form have been pushed by feminists under women’s rights organizations and their government affiliates. Not a shred of ‘equal rights’ for fathers to their children’s care is considered or allowed by such feminists.

As a result of these unconstitutional laws and processes that deny fathers their rights, fathers, families and our freedom are being destroyed. These laws and those people in the state’s divorce and domestic  violence industry that support them and benefit from them together constitute a tyranny against fathers – or often called a ‘war on fatherhood’. Here’s what fathers face under this tyranny.

Slavery of a father at the whim of a mother – under the feminist jurisprudence of family courts

At the mother's whim, the fit father is civilly murdered or civilly raped of his rights, his protections and his children.

For not doing anything wrong, his children are taken from his care, and then he's turned into virtually a slave of the state and the mother who extort from him horrendous and impoverishing weekly payments that euphemistically are called child support for whatever the mother wants to spend them on.  These payments go on until the child reaches as old as 23 years.  And if the father doesn't pay it all he goes to jail, is denied his license to drive, his license to work, and his passport. 

The fit father also faces two badges of infamy against him without him doing anything wrong based on denying him his rights and constitutional protections under the feminist ‘greater good’ laws.  These infamous badges are ‘deadbeat dad’ and ‘abuser’.

If the father can’t pay everything he’s ordered to pay, he’s called a deadbeat. The courts can and will send him to jail without constitutional due process under illegal contempt processes to extort money from him - not unlike mafia thugs enforcing payments of protection from innocent shopkeepers.

Receiving a restraining order (RO) against him requires no provable wrongdoing by him. Only the subjective statement of ‘fear’ by a woman is required for the court to grant it. It’s less than a misdemeanour. But the restraining order paints him as an abusive man to friends, and associates as well as his own children. And, any innocent and harmless violation of the RO will make him a criminal.  

The propaganda to cover-up the truth:

But you'll not hear or read anything of this sort because we're flooded with propaganda of the state’s divorce and domestic violence industry. This industry feeds off the above court-ordered denials of fit and good fathers’ unalienable rights. From them, you’ll hear:

• Women need easily obtained restraining orders to be made safe from intimate partners they say they fear
• Family court processes are necessary to  determine what's in best interest of the children; after all, it’s the children that are most important
• Fathers must 'do the right thing' – pay all the child support ordered by the family court
• Deadbeat dads must be punished for not supporting their children
• The laws dealing with abuse and safety of women are fair and due process is upheld.

These statements sound good but they cover up the tyranny they produce.  Each one is, in fact, a lie 

You'll, of course, never hear my term of 'greater good' excuse laws. Such a name would expose the fact that these laws deny fathers their unalienable rights our country was formed to secure for them. That’s an inconvenient truth which the feminist-instigated divorce and domestic violence industry wants to hide from the public. Exposing it would interfere with the power, money and agenda it produces for them.

 

 

 

 

END