Will You Be Parent One, Parent Two, or, Perhaps, Parent Three?
By Shane Flait © 2011

The new passport application for minors doesn’t require the father’s and mother’s name any more; it now requires the name of parent 1 and parent 2. This ‘word garbage’ of feminist-promoted ‘correctness’ helps to destroy the heterosexual family – the basic unit of society. This nonsense hides the truth.

Each child has a biological father and mother. That father and mother are the child’s natural parents and have first claim – as an unalienable right – to that child. That right is to raise, nurture and support – to parent - that child. Likewise, the child has an inherent right to be parented by both his fit parents.

This natural family has been the basic unit of all societies. The physical connection between the child’s identity and his natural parents promotes the strongest bonds between child and parents – bonds that create both joy, benefits, and sacrifice by the parents to promote the best interests of the child and fortify the family. This family, through its blood line –extends that family relationship – and those natural bonds to grandparents, siblings, and more blood relatives.

These natural bonds have fostered protection and identity for its members. They’ve fostered the growth and preservation of wealth for its members. And they’ve fostered a connection between members that stands the family as independent of government control, interference, and dependence.

The bonds of the natural family engendered in both parents’ rights to their children, are one of the unalienable rights for which the U.S. government was formed to secure. Unfortunately, that’s no longer true!  Government under its feminist-instigated factions and sycophants has abridged overwhelmingly a father’s natural right to parent his child(ren) by perverting the meaning and order of the laws of our land.

It’s done so by imposing ‘greater goods’ determinations such as ‘best interests of the child’ and ‘safety of women’. These commendable-sounding phrases cover-up – the government’s denial of a father’s unalienable right to parent his child – and then other of his constitutional rights and protections. Implementing such greater goods has caused the disenfranchisement of millions of fathers and children from natural family bonds. The pathology of fatherless children is well documented and reflects only the beginning of the damage done to society.

Feminism’s early beginnings preached the need to breakdown families to free women from the chains of obligations. But, like most tyrannies, it has its own vision of how society should be constructed and rejects allowing the ‘free’ choice of society’s members to associate as they wish on an individual basis. Upholding a father’s right to his children would most likely preserve the natural family and all its beneficial protections – including independence of government’s interference, control and dependence. And that’s simply not acceptable.

Making words more tolerant-sounding covers what’s lost

The ‘newspeak’ of Orwell’s ‘1984’ was used to better control the thinking of society in that novel; feminist ‘new speak’ engendered in its ‘political correctness’ serves similarly today.

Family now means any association of people that live together - for a while anyway. And with the government’s destruction of father’ rights along with its interference and control of ‘marriage’, the gay and lesbian communities – with enormous feminist influence – have insinuated themselves into ‘legal marriage’ perverting the terms husband and wife… And with that comes children – somehow.

Only one member of a same sex marriage can be the real parent of the child. The other may adopt him and then she (or he) becomes a step-parent – a step-mother or father – if they wish to use those ‘sexist’ terms. But many lesbian couples don’t adopt the child but attempt to collect child support from fathers whom they’ve deprived of their right to parent their children.  

Now, so as not to hurt the feelings of same sex couples, the government has simply eliminated those sexist ‘father and mother’ words for parent 1 and 2 on their child’s passport applications. The feelings of real fathers and mothers who recognize and delight in their fatherly and motherly roles are ignored – not to mention having to choose who is parent 1.

The press has said that only some conservative Christian groups have objected to eliminating the father and mother words. But the government has decided what’s best for us; and the press is all for it. I guess that’s the way it should be. And it is…in a tyranny!

Since the sex of a parent is irrelevant, there’s simply no need to restrict a child to just two parents – nor marriage to just two spouses. That ‘two’ suggests that old sexist family anyway.

I’m not being intolerant. I’m digging through the verbal garbage to what is at the heart of the issue.

The government is operationally denying fathers their parental rights in the natural family. This abridgment of an unalienable right is destroying the natural family, its extensions and the benefit it brings its members – and most importantly the families ability to remain a bulwark against government interference and dependence on it. That’s a fact; but it’s covered up under the courts’ greater good determinations, feminist instigations and propaganda, dumbed-down politicians and media who are not part of the agenda, and cowardliness.

Redefining the legal family away from the natural family unit and its natural father and mother designations to an apparently more encompassing and sex-neutral paradigm is promoted as more tolerant and ‘equal’. But I’d say that’s part of the new-speak political correctness strategy that obscures the rights and freedoms – and the natural societal relations - that are being lost.

Don’t let any plea for tolerance pull the wool over your eyes – or the word garbage corrupt your clear thinking. Fundamental, constitutional rights are being denied to individuals – mostly fathers. And that’s destroying real families and the rights their children have to their real fathers and their whole family.  

The more ‘freedom’ this government is promoting with it propaganda and political correctness will leave us all with less.

 

 

End